WordPress vs React WordPress vs React
WordPress and React.js are both praised for their functionality and efficiency in application development. As a result, Developers often feel conflicted when deciding which tool to use. In the subsequent paragraphs, we will look at the differences between React and WordPress frameworks.
WordPress is an open-source CMS (content management system). However, it is designed as a simple way to share thoughts and ideas with the world. Besides, it creates websites, including online stores, forums, membership sites, and learning management systems. Its key features include a powerful plugin architecture and a robust template system.
- SEO-friendly: WordPress is the most SEO-friendly CMS. But it needs clean coding and a good structure to achieve this. However, many plugins will help improve the on-page SEO of these projects.
- Community: WordPress has probably the biggest community regarding web development. Many plugins ease third-party integrations and many forums where most of the problems are already solved.
- Ecommerce: WordPress itself cannot be e-commerce. But with the plugin WooCommerce, you can turn any WordPress page into an e-commerce. It can integrate almost any kind of payment system.
- SEO-friendly: There are several tools available to make React web pages SEO-friendly. But they usually have a high cost and it is not easy to set them up.
- Community: There is a big community around React. In addition, there are many libraries published that will make integrations with third-party libraries easy and simple
- Ecommerce: It is possible to build an e-commerce website with React. There are tons of libraries available. The point to be noted, e-commerce sites usually depend on SEO.
Some key differences between WordPress and ReactJS that you should be aware of:
|Installation||Extremely simple||Complicated and requires beforehand knowledge|
|SEO||Extremely efficient||Costly and not easy to set up|
|Knowledge Required||Smaller learning curve||Need to be an expert|
|User Friendly||Extremely User Friendly||Rapid changes/development leads to lower user accessibility|
|Modules or libraries||Does not require any additional modules or libraries to be fully operational||Requires additional modules or libraries to be fully operational|
|Updates||Requires frequent updates to be functional||Does not require updates to be operational|
|Stability||A fully fleshed-out software package||Still under development|